Cases 61 - 70 of 1,053
Mullins v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023mc00018
Petitioner:
Charles Daniel Mullins
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Byrd v. Fitz
as 3:2023cv00067
Petitioner:
George John Byrd
Respondent:
State of TN, Dept of Corrections and Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Lawson
as 2:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
Martin Ellison Hughes
Respondent:
Russell Washburn and Ronnie Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Eller
as 3:2023cv00054
Petitioner:
Jamarcus Jackson
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. Vantell
as 3:2023mc00008
Petitioner:
Lavonte Dominique Simmons
Respondent:
Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Eller et al
as 1:2023cv00014
Petitioner:
Unjolee Moore
Respondent:
Brian Eller and Northeast Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMillion v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2023cv00003
Petitioner:
Jeremy Nathaniel McMillon
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Fitz
as 1:2022cv00316
Petitioner:
Quincy D Scott, Sr.
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estep v. United States of America (TV2)
as 3:2022cv00405
Petitioner:
Jessup Lee Estep
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Land v. Rose
as 1:2022cv00278
Petitioner:
Willard Land
Respondent:
Sharon Rose
Interested Party:
Tennessee Attorney General (Habeas)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
