Cases 1 - 10 of 7,258
Shelton v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
James Michael Shelton
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Frank Strada, Danny H. Goodman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens and Dwayne Jordan
Defendant:
Ricky Hill, FNU Watkins, f/n/u Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Shelby County Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv02274
Plaintiff:
Marqual Hill
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Corrections, Officer Rice and T. Payton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraway v. Fitz
as 2:2024cv02263
Petitioner:
Romilus Caraway
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burton v. Illinois Dept of Corrections Parole Board
as 2:2024cv02259
Petitioner:
Stephon Depaul Burton
Respondent:
Illinois Dept of Corrections Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henry v. Fitz
as 2:2024cv02242
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
Scotty Wayne Henry
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nwokoro v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02246
Petitioner:
Uwanbunkonye Nwokoro
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mason v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center
as 2:2024cv02240
Petitioner:
Devonte Mason
Respondent:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01085
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Moore
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Frank Strata, Jon Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hegel v. TDOC et al
as 1:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
James Frederick Hegel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
