Cases 11 - 20 of 15,584
Harding v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03072
Plaintiff:
Torie M Harding
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Getzels et al v. Kirby Ai et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Zoe Getzels and Quentin Bodiguel
Defendant:
Kirby Ai, Evie Vaughan and Van Venture Ai LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Mendoza v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Alicia Mendoza
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Shields v. USA
as 2:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Forest Jacob Shields
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cortez Jr v. Trejo Jr et al
as 1:2024cv03069
Plaintiff:
Armando Cortez Jr
Defendant:
Glen Trejo Jr, Officer Ceja, Granger Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nightingale v Kottkamp Yedinak & Esworthy PLLC
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
David Nightingale
Defendant:
Kottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Malcomb v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
Paul Wayne Malcomb
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pitts v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Summer Pitts
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Alliance For The Wild Rockies v. US Forest Service et al
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Alliance For The Wild Rockies
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, Joshua White and Carin Vadala
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv05050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
