Seventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 101,273
Mosley v. USA
as 3:2024cv01326
Petitioner: Danyahle L. Mosley
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gines v. Dearmond
as 3:2024cv01318
Plaintiff: Cordell L. Gines
Defendant: A. Dearmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Adkins
as 2:2024cv02114
Petitioner: Juan Ortiz
Respondent: Felicia Adkins
Not Yet Classified: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tracy v. Nall et al
as 4:2024cv04092
Plaintiff: Steven Tracy, Jr
Defendant: . Nall and East Moline Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMON v. HEATHERLY et al
as 1:2024cv00836
Plaintiff: GILBERT RAMON
Defendant: JESSICA HEATHERLY, PRITCHETT, JUAN COLAZOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Childs, Shareef v. Buesgen, C. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00333
Plaintiff: Shareef Childs
Defendant: C. Buesgen, Zemaitis, John Doe Correctional Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Thicklen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00611
Plaintiff: Reginald Scott
Defendant: Xavier Thicklen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCMULLIN v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00184
Petitioner: SHAWN MCMULLIN
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry v. USA
as 1:2024cv00196
Petitioner: Torrence Larry
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Canty v. Lammer
as 1:2024cv04028
Petitioner: Anthony Canty
Respondent: B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?