Massachusetts Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 6,402
Rivera v. U.S District Court
as 1:2024cv10268
Petitioner:
Benito Rivera
Respondent:
U.S District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shiner v. Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center
as 1:2024cv10100
Petitioner:
Dominic Shiner
Respondent:
Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vasbinder v. Evangelidis et al
as 4:2024cv40017
Plaintiff:
William J. Vasbinder
Defendant:
Lewis Evangelidis, David Tuttle, Christopher Brothers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dasilva v. USA 19cr10120-PBS
as 1:2024cv10202
Petitioner:
Nelsy Dasilva
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Souza v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2024cv10208
Petitioner:
Jeffrey A Souza
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDRADE v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv10189
Petitioner:
Jonathan Andrade
Defendant:
Warden
Other:
prose tracking nefpsCPO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Latham v. Hurley et al
as 1:2024cv10130
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Latham
Defendant:
Tina Hurley, Charlene Bonner, Tonomey Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Alves
as 1:2024cv10124
Petitioner:
Craig Smith
Respondent:
Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Piard v. Murphy
as 4:2024cv40005
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Carolyn Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Divris et al
as 1:2024cv10089
Plaintiff:
Timothy Barker
Defendant:
Matthew Divris, Anthony Findley and Joe Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
