US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,497
Jolliff v. Rogers County Sheriff's Department, The et al
as 4:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kathy Jolliff
Defendant:
Rogers County Sheriff's Department, The, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stevens v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Rodger D. Stevens
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Decker v. Tulsa Housing Authority
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Troy Decker
Defendant:
Tulsa Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sims v. Sweet
as 4:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Shaynna Lauren Sims
Respondent:
Christe Sweet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Woods v. City of Claremore et al
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Lance Martel Woods
Defendant:
City of Claremore, Claremore City Police Department, Stan Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper v. County of Tulsa et al
as 4:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Keith-Dewane Hopper
Defendant:
County of Tulsa, Vic Regalado, S Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pack v. Jim et al
as 4:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Darrion Pack
Defendant:
Jeremiah Jim, Jessica Kelly and Darrin Varnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. USA
as 4:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Earl Hardy Morrow
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hibbard v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Matthew Richard Hibbard
Defendant:
Tulsa Police Department, Justin Mcree and Jacob Maryhew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cantrell v. White
as 4:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Christy Cantrell
Respondent:
Tamika White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
