Eleventh Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 35,736
Smith v. Zayaz et al
as 1:2024cv21560
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Angelica Zayas and MDC Childrens Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jamieson et al v. Alvaro et al
as 6:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Ian Michael Jamieson and Deidra Janee Wills
Defendant:
Chad K. Alvaro and Christine E. Arendas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stallworth et al v. Barton et al
as 2:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jermari Marshall and Twyla Stallworth
Defendant:
John G. Barton and City of Andalusia, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Machado v. Brannan et al
as 8:2024cv00997
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Machado
Defendant:
David Brannan, Winter Haven Police Department and City of Winter Haven
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Barley et al v. Islamorada, Village of Islands
as 4:2024cv10038
Plaintiff:
Mary L Barley and Prinston LLC
Defendant:
Islamorada, Village of Islands
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wentworth et al v. Connections Academy
as 1:2024cv01774
Plaintiff:
Dawn Wentworth, Yaw Appiah and Journee Hudson
Defendant:
Connections Academy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Lieberman et al
as 1:2024cv21558
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Steven Lieberman and MDC Childrens Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marston v. Bellsouth Communications LLC
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Scott William Marston
Defendant:
Bellsouth Communications LLC
Williams v. Tik-Tok, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
Tik-Tok, Inc., Zhang Yiming and TIK TOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BROWN v. VANDER ZANDEN et al
as 7:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
ARMAND RASHAD BROWN
Defendant:
TYLER VANDER ZANDEN, CHRIS HICKS and MATTHEW DELACRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
