Eleventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 37,080
Bryson v. Florida State Prison
as 3:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Richard Bryson
Defendant:
Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Burke et al
as 4:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Marcus Cook
Defendant:
Mr. Burke and Mr. John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Barriard
as 1:2024cv01726
Plaintiff:
William M. Taylor
Defendant:
Terry E. Barriard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rice
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, Unit Manager Porter and Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miriam Tidwell v. Jefferson Dunn, et al
as 24-11228
Plaintiff:
MIRIAM TIDWELL, Administrator of the Estate of James O'Quinn, Deceased
Defendant:
JEFFERSON DUNN, Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections in his offical and individual capacities, DEBORA TONEY, In her official and individual capacities, WARDEN, STATON CF and others
Vincent Poole v. State of Florida, et al
as 24-11238
Plaintiff:
VINCENT POOLE
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, FDC MIAMI ASSISTANT WARDEN, JANE DOE and others
Michael Cruz v. Bryant Camareno, et al
as 24-11217
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CRUZ
Defendant:
BRYANT RAYMOND CAMARENO, UNKNOWN LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENTS, DEBRALY DELGADO and others
TOWNES v. DAVIS et al
as 7:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
DARIAN TOWNES
Defendant:
HEATHER DAVIS and WARDEN/C-T VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRIESTER v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRIESTER, JAMES THOMAS and DAVID JACKSON
Defendant:
SCOTT S HARRIS, GRANT MALOY, EUGENE GRINBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez-Garcia v. Woods et al
as 5:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Misbel Rodriguez-Garcia
Defendant:
Billie Woods, FNU Santos and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
