Eleventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 36,993
Torres et al
as 1:2024cv01500
Plaintiff:
Jalon Carlos Torres and United States Pennitentary-Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Warden BRIAN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willie Sturkey v. State of Florida, et al
as 24-11077
Plaintiff:
WILLIE JOE STURKEY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY JAIL, SUSAN LOPEZ and others
Florence v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Florence
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Futral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MADDOX v. MIMS et al
as 5:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL LAMAR MADDOX
Defendant:
CHARLES MIMS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Advent Health et al
as 8:2024cv00781
Plaintiff:
Vernon Jewel Pearson, III
Defendant:
Advent Health and Gracepoint Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Salinas
as 1:2024cv01487
Plaintiff:
Chaney Lewis
Defendant:
Judge Catherine M. Salinas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifton Alexander v. Douglas County Sheriff
as 24-11054
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON Q. ALEXANDER
Defendant:
DOUGLAS COUNTY SHERIFF
WILCOX v. WALTON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
ANTAVIUS TEAZIA WILCOX
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY JAIL and CORRECT HEALTH MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. DOE et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
SHAWN M WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE and SGT TELUR ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
