Eleventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 33,921
Paul Knight v. Keegan Gray, et al
as 24-11232
Plaintiff:
PAUL E. KNIGHT
Defendant:
KEEGAN M. GRAY, MATTHEW KURTH, AUSTIN MERRITT and others
Howard v. City of Savannah et al
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Michael Antonio Howard
Defendant:
City of Savannah, State of Georgia, Judge Lousie Abbot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spaulding v. Dillman
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Kwame Dalas Spaulding
Defendant:
S. Dillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruitt, Jr. v. State Of Georgia et al
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Pruitt, Jr.
Defendant:
State Of Georgia and Superior Court Judge Penny Feeseman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockett et al v. Jenkins Correctional Center
as 6:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Cameron Lockett and Carlos White
Defendant:
Jenkins Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bittelman, Richard v. Weeks et al
as 0:2024cv60653
Plaintiff:
Richard Salvador Bittelman
Defendant:
Gordon Weeks, Wayne Ramelize and Broward Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv01706
Plaintiff:
Antonio Darnell Johnson
Defendant:
Levon Allen, Clayton County Police Department and Clayton County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHEWS v. STREEIT et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant:
J STREEIT and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown II v. Naphcare Healthcare Services et al
as 8:2024cv00936
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Brown, II
Defendant:
Naphcare Healthcare Services and Dr. Ogaga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lorenzo Cole v. Governor of Florida, et al
as 24-11188
Plaintiff:
LORENZO COLE
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, SHERIFF, CITY OF JACKSONVILLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
