US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 19,093
Hill v. Upton
as 1:2024cv01608
Petitioner: Jonathan Hill
Respondent: Warden Steve Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01590
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Veal v. Forsyth County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff: Samuel David Veal
Defendant: Forsyth County Detention Center, Forsyth County Road Deputies, Forsyth County Deputies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Peachtree City P.D. et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff: Terell Owens
Defendant: Peachtree City P.D. and Fayette County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Catoosa County Sheriff's Department Detention Center
as 4:2024cv00103
Plaintiff: Jessica Lynn Bates
Defendant: Catoosa County Sheriff's Department Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. White
as 1:2024cv01570
Petitioner: Jamar Scott
Respondent: Jermaine White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01591
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv01571
Plaintiff: Ronnie Eugene Williams
Defendant: Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElrath v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01572
Plaintiff: Damian Cornell McElrath
Defendant: State of Georgia, Cobb County - GA, U.S. Federal Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Reynolds
as 1:2024cv01604
Plaintiff: Michael Anthony Johnson
Defendant: Sheriff Frank Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?