Second Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 63,155
Ross v. Reinhardt et al
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Ross
Defendant:
J. M. Reinhardt, T. V. Hilton, D. J. Pangallo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yung v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv03304
Petitioner:
John Yung
Respondent:
N.Y.C Mayor Adams, Warden and Commissioner of NYC Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jean-Marie v. Popkin et al
as 3:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jean-Marie
Defendant:
Dean Popkin, John Doe, Blawie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brodeur v. U.S. Government
as 3:2024cv00824
Petitioner:
Christopher Xavier Brodeur
Respondent:
U.S. Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jennings v. Durham et al
as 9:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Khalil Jennings
Defendant:
Correction Sgt. M. Durham, Correction Officer Devon Delaney, Correction Officer M. Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valentin v. Osborn Correctional
as 3:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Jose Valentin
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmona v. Maryellen et al
as 3:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Carmona
Defendant:
Sliya Maryellen, Matthew J Pina, Joel V Ferreira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLeod v. DHS/ICE
as 6:2024cv06269
Plaintiff:
Christopher McLeod
Defendant:
DHS/ICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berrios v. Quiros
as 3:2024cv00803
Petitioner:
Edwin Eddie Berrios
Respondent:
Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saxon v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Robert Saxon
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Department of Corrections, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
