Third Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 141
MOSKAL v. PROVIDENCE CARE CENTER, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv00398
Plaintiff:
RONALD M., MOSKAL
Defendant:
PROVIDENCE CARE CENTER, INC. and CAMPMED CASUALTY & INDEMNITY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
JONES v. AHF/MONTGOMERY INC.
as 2:2010cv00773
Plaintiff:
LEON JONES
Defendant:
AHF/MONTGOMERY INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
PEMBERTON, DR. v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2010cv00268
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
VERHOORN et al v. ANTHEM BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD et al
as 1:2009cv06283
Defendant:
ANTHEM BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD, MEDICARE and PERSONAL CHOICE- HIGH MARK BLUE SHIELD
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN VERHOORN and DONALD VERHOORN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
DUBOSE v. QUINLAN et al
as 2:2009cv05123
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DUBOSE
Defendant:
MARK QUINLAN, DONNA BROWN, ALBERT EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Cooper Univ Hosp v. Secretary HHS
as 09-4095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COOPER HOSPITAL/UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY HHS
Not Party - Amicus Appellant:
QUALITY REIMBURSEMENT SER
PAPCIAK v. SEBELIUS
as 2:2009cv01354
Plaintiff:
MARY BETH PAPCIAK
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Hackensack Univ Med Ctr v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 09-3703
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HACKENSACK UNIV MED CTR
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, Health and Human Services
Defendant - Rule 43 Substitution:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
MARTIN et al v. JOHNSON
as 2:2009cv01694
Plaintiff:
GERALD MARTIN and SHARON REID
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Isadore Kopstein, et al v. Independence Blue Cro
as 09-1232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISADORE KOPSTEIN and DOROTHY KOPSTEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
