Third Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 33,076
MOSS v. MOSS et al
as 2:2024cv05753
Defendant:
JEANNE E MOSS, JEANNE E JEFFERSON, NEW JERSEY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MOSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RAYNOR v. COMCAST CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv01842
Plaintiff:
GILBERT RYAN RAYNOR
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION and DREAMWORKS ANIMATION STUDIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Currington v. Karpin
as 1:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Marlen D. Currington
Defendant:
Patrick Karpin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WAITERS v. TRACFONE WIRELESS INC.
as 1:2024cv05724
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA R. WAITERS
Defendant:
TRACFONE WIRELESS INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WAITERS et al v. REPUBLIC BANK et al
as 1:2024cv05728
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA R. WAITERS, CYLE A. BURNETT and VICKIE BURNETT-WILLIAMS
Defendant:
REPUBLIC BANK and CHERRY HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIVERA v. ONE MAIN STREET EDGEWATER, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv05734
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNI RIVERA
Defendant:
ONE MAIN STREET EDGEWATER, LLC, PEMBROKE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, PEMBROKE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
MURRAY-BEY v. JONES et al
as 3:2024cv05738
Plaintiff:
DANNY-R: MURRAY-BEY
Defendant:
RODERICK JONES and NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATTA v. KAUR et al
as 2:2024cv05743
Plaintiff:
RAHUL MATTA
Defendant:
ANTER PREET KAUR, HARINDER PAL SINGH, KAMALJIT KAUR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: GARVIN
as 2:2024cv01837
Plaintiff:
UMAR GARVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lykens v. Peters et al
as 4:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
Scott Lykens
Defendant:
Colete S. Peters, James Petrucci, Stephen Spaulding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
