U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,082
Heon Yoo v. Brian Barker, et al
as 24-1833
Plaintiff:
HEON JONG YOO, Agent of Hank Yoo
Defendant:
BRIAN BARKER, ASMA NISSAR, CARRIER CLINIC PSYCHIATRISTS and others
Elmer Daniels v. City of Wilmington, et al
as 24-1808
Plaintiff:
ELMER DANIELS
Defendant:
CITY OF WILMINGTON and PHILLIP A. SAGGIONE, Esq.
Andrew Podems v. Union County Child Support Enforcement Unit, et al
as 24-1811
Plaintiff:
ANDREW M. PODEMS
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT UNIT, THERESA E. MULLER, Hearing Officer (spelling Muller?), JAMES HELY, Hearing Officer and others
Tara Chestnut v. ACP/467, et al
as 24-1790
Plaintiff:
TARA CHESTNUT
Defendant:
ACP/467, CHIDIALDI EZENGWU, CHANELL PRATER and others
Adam Urda v. Jeffrey Sosko
as 24-1804
Plaintiff:
ADAM URDA
Defendant:
JEFFREY SOSKO, in his official and individual capacities
Scott Corsnitz, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environ, et al
as 24-1783
Plaintiff:
SCOTT CORSNITZ and GWENDOLYN CORSNITZ
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, FELICIA LAMPHERE, RON EBERT and others
Linda Atiyeh, et al v. Borough of Gettysburg, et al
as 24-1761
Plaintiff:
LINDA ATIYEH, GETTYSBURG INVESTORS LLC, THE GETTYSBURG MOOSE LLC and others
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF GETTYSBURG
Tim Burton v. Marc Ziegler
as 24-1803
Plaintiff:
TIM BURTON
Defendant:
MARC ZIEGLER, in his individual capacity as a Trooper for the Pennsylvania State Police
Lawrence Digiesi v. Township of Bridgewater Police Department, et al
as 24-1768
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE DIGIESI
Defendant:
BRIDGEWATER TOWNSHIP POLICE, ALFRED NICARETTA, KENNETH J. DOLIDA and others
Kenneth Talley, et al v. Judith Horn, et al
as 24-1734
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R. TALLEY, JANICE A. TALLEY and KRISTINA KAREN TALLEY
Defendant:
JUDITH C. HORN, DARREN W. HORN, SR., DARREN W. HORN, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
