Third Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 85,062
USA v. Raymond Howard
as 24-1787
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RAYMOND HOWARD
Hendrickes vs. Nicholas et al
as 3:2024cv00734
Petitioner: Dolly Hendrickes
Respondent: Wendy Nicholas, The Dauphin County District Attorneys Office and The Pennsylvania Office Of Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muhammad v. Mason
as 1:2024cv00529
Petitioner: Walid Abdullah Muhammad, King Walid Abdullah Muhammad and Waliyd Muhammad
Respondent: Bernadette Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nita Patel v. USA
as 24-1739
Plaintiff: NITA PATEL
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
COIT v. CLOSE et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff: KEVIN COIT
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT CLOSE, PA DOC, SECRETARY LAUREL HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: QUINZEL CAIBY
as 2:2024cv01844
Plaintiff: QUINZEL CAIBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05829
Petitioner: LAVAR BRADLEY
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SHEPARD v. JOHN AND JANE DOES et al
as 2:2024cv05823
Plaintiff: MACK CHARLES SHEPARD
Defendant: JOHN AND JANE DOES, UNION CO. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, HUDSON CO. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERRING v. KAUFFMAN
as 2:2024cv01867
Plaintiff: TARAY HERRING
Defendant: EARL G. KAUFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITAKER v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2024cv05773
Petitioner: QUADIR WHITAKER
Respondent: WARDEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?