Third Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,385
Mansour et al v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2024cv06178
Plaintiff:
Norhan Mansour and Omar Polanco
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Mayor STEVEN M. FULOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Seelye v. AOG, LLC
as 2:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
James Seelye
Defendant:
AOG, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Heino v. SAC Wireless, LLC
as 2:2024cv02009
Plaintiff:
Jacob Heino
Defendant:
SAC Wireless, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
VOREL v. SALKOVITZ et al
as 2:2024cv05933
Plaintiff:
AINSLIE H. VOREL
Defendant:
MARC SALKOVITZ and PAMELA SALKOVITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Brian Taylor v. CDS Advantage Solutions, et al
as 24-1806
Plaintiff:
BRIAN L. TAYLOR
Defendant:
CDS ADVANTAGE SOLUTIONS and MARC SULLIVAN
MARTIN v. METEM- A GE POWER BUSINESS et al
as 2:2024cv05648
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MARTIN
Defendant:
METEM- A GE POWER BUSINESS, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
KIM v. BNP MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 2:2024cv05443
Plaintiff:
YEON HEE KIM
Defendant:
BNP MANAGEMENT LLC and JASON PARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Spenillo v. Cleveland-Cliffs Monessen Coke LLC
as 2:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Joseph Spenillo
Defendant:
Cleveland-Cliffs Monessen Coke LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
KAHAN v. KIDDESIGNS, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv05153
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY KAHAN
Defendant:
KIDDESIGNS, INC., SDI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., HTI INDUSTRIES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ALLEN v. ASSERO SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2024cv01557
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDRE ALLEN doing business as ALLEN & SONS PRESERVATION
Defendant:
ASSERO SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
