US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Cases 51 - 60 of 51,618
Endless Mountain Behavioral Health Center Inc. v. Endless Mountains Extended Care, LLC
as 4:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Endless Mountain Behavioral Health Center Inc.
Defendant:
Endless Mountains Extended Care, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Henry Molded Products, Inc. v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00705
Plaintiff:
Henry Molded Products, Inc.
Defendant:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Brotzman v. Posey
as 3:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
John Brotzman
Defendant:
Argil Posey, II and Nicolas Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peck v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Donald James Peck
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cobb v. Neer
as 3:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Helen Cobb
Defendant:
Audrey A. Neer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Bigley v. Alight State College et al
as 4:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Bigley
Defendant:
Alight State College and Mount Nittany Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Muhammad v. Kane
as 3:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Walid Abdullah Muhammad
Defendant:
Yvette Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Goodloe v. Matevousion et al
as 4:2024cv00695
Petitioner:
Ronald E. Goodloe
Respondent:
Andre Matevousion, Warden Thomas E. Bargami and B. Potes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davenport v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Carol Davenport
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
