US District Court for the District of Maryland Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 9,862
Harried v. Prince George's County, Maryland
as 8:2024cv01190
Plaintiff:
Timothy F. Maloney
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY,MD and STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Emiabata v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2024cv01196
Plaintiff:
Philip Emiabata
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Charles and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hall v. Baltimore Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv01137
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hall
Defendant:
BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Donald Licato, Frank Barlow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ash v. Rubin et al
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Ash
Defendant:
Judge Julie R. Rubin and Stephanie Savoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
