US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,992
Asanov v. Sukeena et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Alexander N. Asanov
Defendant:
Belinda K. Sukeena, Tanya A. Plekan, Julie L. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Martin v. Hayes
as 2:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Antoine D. Martin
Defendant:
Dexter Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. Sumner
as 5:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Quentin T. Sumner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Wake County, North Carolina
as 5:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Davis
Defendant:
Wake County, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carmon v. Ennis et al
as 4:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Darron Antonio Carmon
Defendant:
John Derek Ennis and Town of Winterville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. State of North Carolina Pitt County et al
as 7:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Bryan Anthony Turner
Defendant:
State of North Carolina Pitt County, Verna Donnelly, Sharon Rochelle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Poole v. Hawkins
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Dallas C. Poole, Sr.
Defendant:
Carey Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carroway et al v. Cepco Management Services, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Carl Carroway, Lisa Walker Young, Mary Ryan Shepard and others
Defendant:
Cepco Management Services, LLC and Lantana Crossing HOA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lasorsa v. Bell
as 5:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Ronald S. Lasorsa
Defendant:
James Edward Bell, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Paris v. BJ Inspection Inc. DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE CASE NO. 5:24-CV-28-M-KS.
as 4:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Angie Paris
Defendant:
BJ Inspection Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
