US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 9,997
MASHORE v. NAVES
as 1:2024cv00342
Plaintiff: RODRIQUEZ DWAYNE MASHORE
Defendant: SGT JASON JAGGER NAVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCE v. TOLBERT et al
as 1:2024cv00337
Plaintiff: KENYON J. SPENCE
Defendant: SGT. TOLBERT and SGT. LENWOOD GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMALLWOOD v. SAMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00325
Plaintiff: LAMARQUIS SMALLWOOD
Defendant: DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. SAMPSON, SGT. BETHAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARNOLD v. USBOP
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff: TRAVIS D. ARNOLD
Defendant: USBOP STAFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
LAFOND v. USA
as 1:2024cv00330
Petitioner: JUVONTA DESHAUN LAFOND
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SPRAUVE v. UNKNOWN OFFICIAL AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv00320
Plaintiff: JON C. SPRAUVE
Defendant: UNKNOWN OFFICIAL AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAMBERS v. SHU STAFF AT UNITED STATES PENITENTARY
as 1:2024cv00309
Petitioner: MARCUS DONTRIEL CHAMBERS
Respondent: SHU STAFF AT UNITED STATES PENITENTARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
GRIFFITH v. OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2024cv00313
Plaintiff: MELISSA ANN GRIFFITH
Defendant: OFFICIALS AT ANSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00305
Petitioner: JUSTIN GUNSAIN MATTHEWS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SWINSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00304
Petitioner: CHARLES ANTHONY SWINSON, JR.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?