US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 9,991
WILLIAMS v. KERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
DEDRICK L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RALPH KERSEY, B.J. KNIGHT, KIM FOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRAUVE v. UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
JON C. SPRAUVE
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPARROW v. USA
as 1:2024cv00177
Petitioner:
RICHARD AARON SPARROW
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
LINDSEY EL BEY v. CLODFELTER
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
DERRICK JERVON LINDSAY EL BEY
Defendant:
District Attorney T. Lynn Clodfelter and STANLY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLARY v. STEWARD et al
as 1:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
RONALD MCCLARY
Defendant:
FNU STEWARD, FNU HARGROVE, SERGEANT RANSOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYKINS v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
RODERICK BOYKINS
Defendant:
S.R.G. CAPTAIN LOCKLEAR, (FNU SCOTT) MS. SCOTT, DEAN LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. USA
as 1:2024cv00170
Petitioner:
JORDAN HART
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SMALL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
STEPHEN ALLEN SMALL, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TISDALE v. WEAVIL et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
IVORY JOE TISDALE
Defendant:
T.A. WEAVIL, DANNY ROGERS, VERONICA L. EDMINSTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PORTER v. YATES et al
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
ANTWAIN PORTER
Defendant:
YATES, ALFRED ALONZO SCOTT, JR., HARGROVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
