US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 51 - 60 of 23,858
SMALLWOOD v. SAMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
LAMARQUIS SMALLWOOD
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. SAMPSON, SGT. BETHAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARNOLD v. USBOP
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS D. ARNOLD
Defendant:
USBOP STAFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
MONDI v. TRUCKIN MOVERS CORPORATION
as 1:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Noelle Mondi
Defendant:
Truckin Movers Corporation and Douglas Carlton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
DIAL v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER DIAL
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
UPADHAYAY v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
JHAPENDRA UPADHAYAY
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, DIRECTOR CHRISTOPHER HEFFRON and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
LAFOND v. USA
as 1:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
JUVONTA DESHAUN LAFOND
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SHACKELFORD v. ACES, LLC
as 1:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
JAMES SHACKELFORD
Defendant:
ACES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
LILLY v. SWIFT RESPONSE, LLC
as 1:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Dinah Lilly
Defendant:
SWIFT RESPONSE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
SPRAUVE v. UNKNOWN OFFICIAL AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
JON C. SPRAUVE
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICIAL AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CITY OF BURLINGTON v. THE 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
CITY OF BURLINGTON
Defendant:
THE 3M COMPANY, AGC, INC., AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS, INC. and others
Material Witne:
BASF CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
