West Virginia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,445
Adams v. Thrasher et al
as 2:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Maggie Adams
Defendant:
Officer Thrasher and John/Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Daniel v. Preece et al
as 3:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Trey Daniel
Defendant:
Deborah L. Preece, Rick Thompson, Billy Dell Runyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Preece et al
as 1:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Trey Daniel
Defendant:
Deborah L Preece, Rick Thompson, Billy Dell Runyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. State of West Virginia
as 1:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Jones
Defendant:
State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Stickel v. Harrison County Commission et al
as 1:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Joshua Chad Stickel
Defendant:
Harrison County Commission, Sheriff Robert Matheny and Deputy William J. Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1211 - Americans with Disabilities Act
Goines v. Nicholson et al
as 1:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Frank Goines, II
Defendant:
Thunder Nicholson, John Wyatt and Jeremy Farling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
