Fifth Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 531
Singleton v. REV Recreation Group Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00400
Plaintiff:
Joel Singleton
Defendant:
REV Recreation Group Inc. and Dixie Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Odom v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Chris Odom
Defendant:
SoClean, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Advanced Anti-Aging Center L L C v. Cutera Inc
as 6:2022cv00890
Plaintiff:
Advanced Anti-Aging Center, LLC and Advanced Anti-Aging Center L L C
Defendant:
Cutera Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. New York Air Brake, LLC
as 1:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Defendant:
New York Air Brake, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baize et al v. Mendoza et al
as 6:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Angelena Nefferttii Dent Baize and Shelby Wayne McGahey
Defendant:
Kathleen Mendoza, Mark Calhoun, Simon Owen and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410 Right to Financial Privacy Act
BeDoit v. SoClean Inc
as 3:2022cv00556
Plaintiff:
Eugene BeDoit
Defendant:
SoClean Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Morris v. SoClean Inc
as 1:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Defendant:
SoClean Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Lacy et al v. Family Dollar, Inc., A North Carolina Corporation
as 3:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Martha Keisha Lacy, Lorraine Bennett-Freeman, Sheena Bibbs and others
Defendant:
Family Dollar, Inc., A North Carolina Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wharton v. SoClean Inc
as 5:2022cv00525
Plaintiff:
Charlie Wharton
Defendant:
SoClean Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Hixon v. SoClean Inc
as 3:2022cv00526
Plaintiff:
Richard Hixon
Defendant:
SoClean Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
