Fifth Circuit Forfeiture / Penalty Cases

Other Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 974
United States of America v. 211 County Road 4221, Decatur, Texas et al
as 4:2015cv00395
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $69,903.05 in United States Currency
as 4:2015cv00280
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $69,903.05 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. $44,393.00 United States Currency
as 5:2015cv00079
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: $44,393.00 United States Currency
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture in Rem
Luigi Montes v. USA
as 15-40450
Plaintiff - Appellant: LUIGI MONTES
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States Of America v. SIG SAUER, MODEL P226, 22 CALIBER PISTOL, SERIAL NO. M525362; et al
as 3:2015cv00092
Respondent: 125 ROUNDS, MORE OR LESS, OF 9 CALIBER AMMUNITION, 149 ROUNDS, MORE OR LESS, OF 40 CALIBER AMMUNITION; AND, 15 ROUNDS, MORE OR LESS, OF 38 CALBER AMMUNITION; and others
Petitioner: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. One 2003 Freightliner Columbia 120; CL12064ST
as 7:2015cv00126
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: One 2003 Freightliner Columbia 120; CL12064ST
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture in Rem
USA v. 2011 DODGE RAM 3500
as 5:2015cv00054
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: 2011 DODGE RAM 3500
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. Garcia Cano
as 2:2015cv00034
Defendant: German Garcia Cano
Respondent: Diana Rios
Plaintiff: USA
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
Herrera v. United States of America
as 7:2015cv00108
Plaintiff: Marcelo Herrera
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Lot 219, Pittman Park
as 4:2015cv00657
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: Lot 219, Pittman Park
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture in Rem
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.