US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,763
Williams v. Dart Transit Company [US DOT#75525] et al
as 2:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Gerrick Darell Williams
Defendant:
Dart Transit Company [US DOT#75525], Fleetline doing business as Dart Transit Company, Quantrez Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Kravets v. City of McKinney et al
as 4:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Igor Kravets
Defendant:
City of McKinney and Detective Carl Severin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Toribiong v. Whipps, Jr.
as 4:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Christa N. Toribiong
Defendant:
Surangel Whipps, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Adams v. Panola County et al
as 6:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Kristeen Brooke Adams
Defendant:
Panola County, Panola County Sheriff's Dept, Panola County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Booth v. Miller et al
as 4:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Booth
Defendant:
Brantley Miller and Michael Ganatos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Demunbrun v. Estep et al
as 4:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Demunbrun
Defendant:
Detective Mitchell Estep and Detective Paul Keith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
