US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 11,303
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Leal v. 371st Criminal District Court of Tarrant County
as 4:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Leal
Defendant:
371st Criminal District Court of Tarrant County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drake v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation, Walter Craig Jelinek, John C Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Drake v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Stephanie Nicole Mitchell, Chika Anyiam, Dallas County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Horton v. Northern District Federal Gov
as 3:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Horton
Defendant:
Northern District Federal Gov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
