Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 102,525
Wolfford v. Ernestine
as 9:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Wolfford
Defendant:
Julye Ernestine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01681
Petitioner:
DLance Chazion Anderson
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harvey v. Galveston Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Harvey, Jr
Defendant:
Galveston Police Department and Officer L. Mearlon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elizondo v. State Judge of the 38th District Court et al
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Jaime Elizondo
Defendant:
State Judge of the 38th District Court and District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dailey v. TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
Anthony Ray Dailey
Respondent:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ashlock v. Coke County Sheriff
as 5:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
Calvin Ashlock
Respondent:
Coke County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Saucedo v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00090
Petitioner:
Bobby Saucedo
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nunez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Albino Nunez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hancock v. Mr. Skinner et al
as 4:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hancock
Defendant:
Doctor FNU Bahramri, FNU Mr. Skinner and Marg. Stevas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boswell v. Huntsville Parole et al
as 6:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
John A. Boswell
Defendant:
Huntsville Parole, Carmella Jones, Michael Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
