Sixth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 8,540
Lykins v. Mane Inc.
as 1:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Tangela Lykins
Defendant:
Mane Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wheat v. Abbott Laboratories
as 2:2024cv01972
Plaintiff:
Myra Wheat
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SHANKLIN et al v. UNITED TOWING INC
as 2:2024cv11097
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SHANKLIN, DWAYNE MCWILLIAMS, LONNIE NORMAN and others
Defendant:
UNITED TOWING INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Seiber v. Shelby County Government
as 2:2024cv02261
Plaintiff:
Mary E Seiber
Defendant:
Shelby County Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hughes et al v. DTE Electric Company
as 2:2024cv11075
Plaintiff:
Terrance Hughes and Barbrea Young
Defendant:
DTE Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lewis v. Cleveland Medical Devices, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Robin Lewis
Defendant:
Cleveland Medical Devices, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Lindsey v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02254
Plaintiff:
Lequintin Lindsey
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores, Inc., Family Dollar Stores of Tennessee, LLC. and Dollar Tree Family Dollar, LLC.
Anderson et al v. Bluegrass Hospitality Group, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Sabina Anderson and Paul Prestarri
Defendant:
Bluegrass Hospitality Group, LLC and Bluegrass Hospitality Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hunter v. Village of Ripley
as 1:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Owen Hunter
Defendant:
Village of Ripley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tucker v. Ron Hall's Famous Final Cleaning Company
as 1:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Andre Tucker
Defendant:
Ron Hall's Famous Final Cleaning Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
