US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,991
Agins v. Madison County Jail
as 1:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Ahmeada Agins
Defendant:
Madison County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Wardlow et al
as 1:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Curtis Taylor
Defendant:
Jerry Wardlow, Purtle, Olsburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Henderson County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Webb
Defendant:
Henderson County Jail, Jeffery Smith, Jackie Bausman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toomes v. Working et al
as 1:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Antonio Toomes
Defendant:
Michael Ryan Working and Clayburn Peeples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baine v. Weaver et al
as 1:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Jason Baine
Defendant:
Clyde Weaver, Steven Whitlock and Decatur County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Taylor et al
as 2:2024cv02024
Plaintiff:
Henry Morris
Defendant:
Daniel J. Taylor and Spragins, Barnett, Cobb & Butler, Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Trump
as 2:2024cv02022
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Roy J Webster
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Commissioner Internal Revenue Service, US Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Lipman
as 2:2024cv02021
Plaintiff:
Rickey Benson
Defendant:
Sheryl H. Lipman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Philip v. Executive Clemency Unit et al
as 1:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Ashton Jamarr Philip
Defendant:
Executive Clemency Unit, Zane Duncan, Roberta Kustoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
