Seventh Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 65,921
Thomas v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03758
Plaintiff:
John Thomas
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Rush University Medical Center, Jhoanna Mazari and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Nelson v. Skutnik et al
as 1:2024cv03750
Plaintiff:
Lajon Nelson
Defendant:
Mark Skutnik and Ivan Villalobos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
BOGGS v. HOLMES et al
as 1:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BOGGS
Defendant:
CHASE HOLMES, JASON MYERS, TRAVIS KEMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Malone et al v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2024cv03111
Plaintiff:
Nadeja Malone, Stephen Paris, Acelyn Paris and others
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Kevin byrd, Derek Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Massey v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv03724
Plaintiff:
Carlos L Massey
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Sarah Jones, James W Glasgow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
