Indiana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 18,374
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Forte v. Rutkowski et al
as 3:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Jennipher Renee Forte
Defendant:
Erik Rutkowski, Jason Cuchowicz, Barbara Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hovermale v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 3:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hovermale
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BENAVIDEZ v. LIPPERT COMPONENTS, INC.
as 3:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
CARLOS BENAVIDEZ
Defendant:
LIPPERT COMPONENTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RICE v. CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RICE
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, K. DANIELS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caraballo v. Forgey et al
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Frank Caraballo
Defendant:
William Forgey, M.D. and Correctional Health Indiana, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Wabash County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Chad Jackson
Defendant:
Wabash County Sheriff, Brooke Murphy, Ms. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
