US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 9,395
Wright v. Aker et al
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
DaShawn Wright
Defendant:
CO Aker, CO Westburg, E Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Green et al
as 2:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Marcus T Roberts, Jr
Defendant:
CO Green, Randall Hepp, CO Veguilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00371
Petitioner:
Deon Brown
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jiles v. Van Buren
as 2:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Joseph F Jiles
Defendant:
Torria M Van Buren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gordon v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Bernard T Gordon, Sr
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Green Bay Correctional Institution and Green Bay Correctional Institution Health Services Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Smathers et al
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Kevin Joseph Washington, Jr
Defendant:
Alexandra Kathleen Smathers, Xavier Solis and Gerad Dougvidlo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Noble
as 2:2024cv00353
Petitioner:
Lathan Steven Ward
Respondent:
Jon Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
