District Court Cases in Arkansas
Cases 61 - 70 of 65,630
Coleman et al v. State Farm Mutual Auomobile Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv05097
Plaintiff:
James Steven Coleman and James David Coleman
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Mumford et al v. Safelite Group Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Virginia Mumford and Brandon Mumford
Defendant:
Safelite Group Inc and Hunter Lee Roberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Tolston v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Tolston
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pate v. Haney
as 4:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
William Glen Pate, Jr
Defendant:
Sarah Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. Gibson
as 4:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Wood
Defendant:
James Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Jaad v. USA
as 3:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Rafeq Al-Jaad
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2023 Food Stamp Act
Tire House, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv04033
Plaintiff:
Tire House, Inc.
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance ompany
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Finley v. McCormick et al
as 6:2024cv06057
Plaintiff:
Jaime Glenn Finley and Possum
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike McCormick, Joel Ware, Chief S. Elrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crutchfield v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Katherine Crutchfield
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Finley v. Smith # 168 et al
as 6:2024cv06058
Plaintiff:
Jaime Glenn Finley and Possum
Defendant:
W. Smith # 168 and B. Rosburg # 366
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
