Ninth Circuit Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 508
Loomis v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv00399
Defendant:
JENNIFER GRAHAM, United States of America Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service, John and Jane Does 1-99 and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES WONG and Carrie Loomis
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6212
Blanchard v. Wright et al
as 2:2018cv01265
Plaintiff:
Susan Eileen Blanchard
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service, Does 1-99 and Ronda Wright
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Horton
as 3:2018cv01855
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Eric L. Horton
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604
Cashmarq Global Consultants, Inc., v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2018cv04069
Plaintiff:
Cashmarq Global Consultants, Inc.
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
Pelletier v. United States of America Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2018cv01331
Plaintiff:
Gaetan Pelletier
Defendant:
United States of America Internal Revenue Service , Megan Harris and Marilyn Winters
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Castillo et al v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2018cv05213
Petitioner:
Joseph Castillo and Veldt LLC
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410
Castillo et al v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2018cv05214
Petitioner:
Joseph Castillo and Veldt LLC
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410
Hsu et al v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv06698
Petitioner:
Hsiu-Ying Hsu and Jian-Ci "Jason" Ho
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Hsu et al v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv06697
Petitioner:
Hsiu-Ying Hsu and Jian-Ci "Jason" Ho
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
