Oregon Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,315
Turner v. Guardian Real Estate Services et al
as 3:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
Guardian Real Estate Services and WestTown on 8th
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Subasic v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Slobodan Subasic
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, Oregon Department of Administrative Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hardt v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Dale Everett Hardt
Defendant:
City of Portland, Scott Moede, Elsa Haag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A. A. v. Echtenkamp et al
as 3:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
A. A.
Defendant:
Emily Echtenkamp, Loren Calkins and Leonard Cain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen et al v. Destination XL Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Allen and Elaine Higgins
Defendant:
Destination XL Group, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mitchell v. Kott et al
as 6:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Jeannene Mitchell
Defendant:
Shelly Kott, US Bancorp, Sharon Kott Prosise and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LaTulippe v. Oregon Medical Board et al
as 3:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Steven LaTulippe
Defendant:
Oregon Medical Board, Kathleen Harder, Ali Mageehon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis, Jr. v. Safeway, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Safeway Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
S.Q. v. Echtenkamp et al
as 3:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
S. Q.
Defendant:
Emily Echtenkamp, Loren Calkins, Juan Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ash v. City of Portland
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Ash
Defendant:
City of Portland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
