Oregon Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,315
Youth 71Five Ministries v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Youth 71Five Ministries
Defendant:
Charlene Williams, Brian Detman and Cord Bueker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. GSL Properties, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Brooklynn C. Clark
Defendant:
GSL Properties, Inc., CBRF GWS Real Estate Services, Inc., One + Three Centerpointe Drive and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Oravetz v. Federal Reserve of San Fransico
as 6:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
Federal Reserve of San Fransico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oravetz v. State Navada Treasury
as 6:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
State Navada Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oravetz v. State Navada Treasury
as 6:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
State Navada Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oravetz v. Bristol Bay Economic Development Corp
as 6:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
Bristol Bay Economic Development Corp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oravetz v. Jefferson County Sheriffs et al
as 6:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriffs and Washinton State MSO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oravetz v. Clallam County Sheriffs et al
as 6:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
Clallam County Sheriffs and Washington State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mouton v. Safeway, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Conrad Mouton
Defendant:
Safeway, Inc. and Lar Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Scherer v. Gladstone School District et al
as 3:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Glenda Scherer
Defendant:
Gladstone School District, Bob Stewart and Tracy Oberg Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
