US District Court for the Western District of Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 8,923
Butler v. Hanken et al
as 2:2023cv01624
Plaintiff:
David D Butler
Defendant:
James Hanken, Calvin Cogburn and Steven Jewitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Hess et al
as 3:2023cv05940
Plaintiff:
Horace Hill, Jr
Defendant:
Kenneth Hess, Josephine Townsend, Ana Michelle Joy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfclan v. Menesses et al
as 3:2023cv05938
Plaintiff:
Justin Allen Davey and Echota Wolfclan
Defendant:
Jilma Menesses, Charles Sutherlin, Cassi Villegas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dickens v. NaphCare
as 3:2023cv05934
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Dickens
Defendant:
NaphCare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kvashuk v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01605
Petitioner:
Volodymyr Kvashuk
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. White et al
as 2:2023cv01587
Plaintiff:
Darwin L Williams
Defendant:
Dan White, C Klimper, E Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Wakeman
as 3:2023cv05931
Plaintiff:
Mario Wilson
Defendant:
Gary Wakeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Person v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv05926
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shrone Person and Anthony Shane Person
Defendant:
Ramona M Jones, Romona M Person, Alannah M Athens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Basra v. Keenan et al
as 2:2023cv01561
Petitioner:
Paramjit Singh Basra
Respondent:
David Keenan and Donald Raz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Joy
as 3:2023cv05924
Plaintiff:
Horace Hill, Jr
Defendant:
Anna Michelle Joy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
