US District Court for the Western District of Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 8,913
Corbray v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05284
Petitioner:
Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burch v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05286
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Burch
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Norfolk Sheriff et al
as 2:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
James Dion Palmer
Defendant:
Norfolk Sheriff, Glenn Youngkin and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butsch v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00482
Petitioner:
Clayton E Butsch
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fuller v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00483
Petitioner:
Jesse Thomas Fuller
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Owens v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05272
Petitioner:
Bryan Michael Owens
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Farnsworth v. Furst et al
as 3:2024cv05275
Plaintiff:
Charles V Farnsworth
Defendant:
M.L. Furst, D Dahne and Kathy Reninger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnston v. Isack
as 3:2024cv05270
Plaintiff:
Jacob A Johnston
Defendant:
Jamie Isack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnston v. Nelson et al
as 3:2024cv05271
Plaintiff:
Jacob A Johnston
Defendant:
Nelson, Frank Gilletti, Heather Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Maneses et al
as 3:2024cv05267
Plaintiff:
Darrick L Hunter
Defendant:
Jilma Maneses, David Flynn, Cheryl Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
