US District Court for the Western District of Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 8,909
Nanez v. Sapp et al
as 3:2024cv05293
Plaintiff:
Shawn Dale Nanez
Defendant:
Penelope Sapp, Genie Elton, K. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rouse v. Mason County et al
as 3:2024cv05291
Plaintiff:
Rustin Lee Rouse and Rusty Lee Rouse
Defendant:
Mason County, Randy Newell, Kevin Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michalek v. Hopkins et al
as 3:2024cv05289
Plaintiff:
Brian Judah Michalek
Defendant:
Hopkins, Wright-Brown, Lungsford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rojas v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05281
Petitioner:
Francisco Salgado Rojas
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Branch v. Boe
as 2:2024cv00517
Petitioner:
Derrick Branch
Respondent:
Jeri Boe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belmonte v. King County et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Damers Shirak Duranzan and David Belmonte
Defendant:
King County, King County Department of Public Defense, Anita Khandelwal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbray v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05284
Petitioner:
Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burch v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05286
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Burch
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Norfolk Sheriff et al
as 2:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
James Dion Palmer
Defendant:
Norfolk Sheriff, Glenn Youngkin and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butsch v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00482
Petitioner:
Clayton E Butsch
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
