U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,392
Sarah Norris v. City of Asheville
as 24-1206
Plaintiff:
SARAH BODDY NORRIS, ABIGAIL TEMOSHCHUK-REYNOLDS, AMY HAMILTON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF ASHEVILLE, DEBRA CAMPBELL, in her official capacity as Asheville City Manager, D. TYRELL MCGIRT, in his individual capacity and official capacity as Director of the Asheville Parks and Recreation Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Afshin Bahrampour v. National Security Agency
as 24-1202
Plaintiff:
AFSHIN BAHRAMPOUR
Defendant:
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
Paul Shao v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 24-1204
Plaintiff:
PAUL SHAO
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Mithun Banerjee v. Rand Gelber
as 24-1198
Plaintiff:
MITHUN BANERJEE
Defendant:
JUDGE RAND LEWIS GELBER, ADMIN JUDGE SHERRI DEBRA KOCH, JUDGE JOHN CHRISTIAN MOFFETT and others
Matilda Turner v. Micah Ennis
as 24-1189
Plaintiff:
MATILDA TURNER
Defendant:
MICAH ENNIS, Rowan County School Director, ROWAN COUNTY COURTHOUSE, DAYMARK RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. and others
Paul Shao v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 24-1190
Plaintiff:
PAUL SHAO
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Marty Hierholzer v. Isabel Guzman
as 24-1187
Plaintiff:
MARTY HIERHOLZER and MJL ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Virginia corporation
Defendant:
ISABEL GUZMAN, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Small Business Administration and SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Wesley Smith, III v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-1181
Plaintiff:
WESLEY EDWARD SMITH, III
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, TIM KAINE, ROBERT A. DYBING and others
Mithun Banerjee v. Timothy Branigan
as 24-1184
Plaintiff:
MITHUN BANERJEE
Defendant:
MR. TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN, JUDGE PETER J. MESSITTE, PJM, JUDGE MARIA ELLENA CHAVEZ-RUARK, MCR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
