U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 6,172
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tati King v. Glenn Youngkin
as 24-1265
Plaintiff:
TATI ABU KING, TONI HEATH JOHNSON and BRIDGING THE GAP IN VIRGINIA
Defendant:
GLENN YOUNGKIN, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, KELLY GEE, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth of Virginia, JOHN O'BANNON, in his official capacity as Chairman of the State Board of Elections for the Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Melvin Gibbs v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 24-1262
Appellant:
M. EUGENE GIBBS and MELVIN EUGENE GIBBS
Defendant:
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Plaintiff:
KRISTOFFER HICKS, LAQUITA OLIVER, CHERELLE JACOB and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dan Chacko v. Melissa Preston
as 24-1243
Plaintiff:
DAN CHACKO
Defendant:
MELISSA PRESTON, DAVID POWELL, JOHN R. FORD and others
Elizabeth Roberts v. John Does 1 to 2
as 24-1241
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH ROBERTS
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-2 and CITY OF HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND, A Municipal Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Randall Williams v. Charleston County Sheriff's Office
as 24-1238
Plaintiff:
RANDALL WILLIAMS, Personal Representative of the Estates of Shanice R. Dantzler-Williams and Miranda R. Dantzler-Williams and BETTY SIMMONS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Stephanie Dantzler
Defendant:
EMILY PELLETIER, CLINTON SACKS, CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
