U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 61 - 70 of 82,026
John Karl, Jr. v. Daniel Werfel
as 24-1346
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. KARL, JR.
Defendant:
DANIEL I. WERFEL, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JONATHAN R. BRONLEY, in his Capacity as Administrator, C.T.A., d.b.n. for the Estate of Linda J. Solomon, deceased
Steven Boas v. Jason Graves
as 24-1343
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MATTHEW BOAS
Defendant:
JASON GRAVES, in his individual capacity as deputy sheriff, St. Mary's County, TIMOTHY K. CAMERON, in his official capacity as the Executive, St. Mary's County Sheriff Office, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Brandon Pickens v. Todd Ishee
as 24-6371
Petitioner:
BRANDON MICHAEL PICKENS
Respondent:
TODD E. ISHEE, Secretary of North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
Ray Blanchard v. Brian Frosh
as 24-6372
Petitioner:
RAY A. BLANCHARD
Respondent:
BRIAN E. FROSH, Attorney General for the State of Maryland and WARDEN GREGORY WERNER
Mcardle Family Partnership v. Antero Resources Corporation
as 24-1347
Plaintiff:
MCARDLE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, a Pennsylvania Limited Partnership, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant:
ANTERO RESOURCES CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, KEY OIL COMPANY, a West Virginia corporation and FRANKLIN L. BUTLER, an individual
Alia Al-Sabah v. World Business Lenders, LLC
as 24-1345
Plaintiff:
ALIA SALEM AL-SABAH
Defendant:
WORLD BUSINESS LENDERS, LLC, ROBERT WILLIAMS, UPTOWN COMMERICAL CAPITAL and others
Grant Anderson v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections
as 24-1339
Plaintiff:
GRANT ANDERSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONS, STATE OF MARYLAND and PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF OF POLICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
