US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,363
Foreman v. Graddick (INMATE 1)(MEMBER CASE)
as 2:2021cv00118
Plaintiff:
Mack Auther Foreman, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles Graddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foreman v. Gwathney, et al. (INMATE 2)(LEAD CASE)
as 2:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Mack Auther Foreman, Jr.
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney
Consolidated Defendant:
Cliff Walker, Charles Graddick and Dwayne Spurlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foreman v. Walker (INMATE 2)(MEMBER CASE)
as 2:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
Mack Auther Foreman, Jr.
Defendant:
Cliff Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Person v. Cazlor (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00103
Defendant:
Cecelia Cazlor
Plaintiff:
Eric T. Person
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Posten v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2) (LEAD)
as 1:2021cv00061
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Elba Work Release and Alabama Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Charles Posten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brocato v. Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles
Plaintiff:
Ryan Anthony Brocato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Bright (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv01051
Defendant:
Lynn C. Bright
Plaintiff:
Larry Terrell Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv01057
Plaintiff:
Harold Gilmore
Defendant:
Charles Graddick, Jefferson S. Dunn and Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Platt v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv01055
Plaintiff:
Earnest F. Platt
Defendant:
Charles Graddick, Jefferson S. Dunn and Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatom v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv01056
Defendant:
Charles Graddick, Jefferson S. Dunn and Kay Ivey
Plaintiff:
Jerre Chatom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
