Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 5,294
Mitchell et al v. Selma City Board of Education et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Trumaine Mitchell, Sr. and Latonya Mines
Defendant:
Selma City Board of Education and Stoney Pritchett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander v. Dunn et al
as 7:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Betty Alexander
Defendant:
Commissioner Jefferson Dunn, Commissioner Ruth Naglich, Warden Christopher Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tarabein v. Pensacola Airport Police et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Rassan M. Tarabein
Defendant:
Pensacola Airport Police, Maria Landy, Kathryn Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Collins v. Hatfield et al
as 2:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Tyler Collins
Defendant:
Larry Hatfield and Matt Spradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Craig v. F. et al
as 2:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Anthony M Craig, Jr
Defendant:
Melanie F. and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Andalusia Alabama Police et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Andalusia Alabama Police and Covington County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McQueen v. Flowers (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Tenika McQueen
Defendant:
Felicia Franklin Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RoettO'Connor v. Pelham, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Gregjoy RoettO'Connor
Defendant:
Pelham, City of, Clifton Powell, William Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ortiz v. Angel et al
as 2:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Ortiz
Defendant:
Edgar A Angel, Andrew T Posten and Alabaster, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. Hydromax USA et al
as 2:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Fatuma Robertson
Defendant:
Hydromax USA and Tommy Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
