Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 7,798
Mosley v. Baker et al
as 4:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Mosley
Defendant:
Baker and Dent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carden v. Gurley et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Shane Eugene Carden
Defendant:
Dr. Gurley and Mike Mull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. The State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jhamal Dwayne Crawford
Defendant:
The State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Officer Kopps
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Murphy
Defendant:
Officer Kopps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Winston L. Harrison
Defendant:
Bruce Maddox, Marvin W. Wiggins, Erica K. Kemmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Limestone Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 3)
as 5:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Gene Walker
Defendant:
Limestone Correctional Facility, Deborah Toney and Officer Billingsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerido v. Henline et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Antonio Orlander Jerido
Defendant:
Mike Henline, Ranier Daramus, James Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carstarphen v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Andre Maurice Carstarphen, Jr.
Defendant:
Noah Price Oliver, Q. Brown, Level Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Gordy
as 7:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Corey Khalil Jackson
Defendant:
Warden Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pritchett v. Norman (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Lanair Pritchett
Defendant:
Tyler W. Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
