US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,271
Odem v. Felts et al
as 4:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jack Odem, III
Defendant:
John Felts, Andy Shock, Lona McCastlain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Provencio v. Huckabee
as 4:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wayne Provencio
Defendant:
Sara Sanders Huckabee and Sarah Huckabee Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
John Ellis Johnson
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. Does
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Maurice Williamson
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brownel v. Irwin
as 4:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Dion Brownel
Defendant:
Ronald Irwin d/b/a Dr. Ronald Irwin, Ph.D., Clinical Psychologist, License #93-3P
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Provencio v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wayne Provencio
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, William M Jones, Camille Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woolford v. Honorable et al
as 4:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Sterling Duane Woolford, Sr
Defendant:
Latonya Honorable and Don Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCurley v. Atkins Police Department
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Jesse L McCurley
Defendant:
Atkins Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCurley v. Pottsville Police Department
as 4:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Jesse L McCurley
Defendant:
Pottsville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Israel v. Fenner et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
CessanadaKha Jahish Israel
Defendant:
Duane Edward Fenner, Holmes, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
