US District Court for the Eastern District of California Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Preddy v. US Medicare Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Preddy
Defendant:
US Medicare Solutions, Inc., Keith Mendonsa and April Feil
Payton v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 2:2023cv01886
Plaintiff:
Craig M. Payton
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Payton v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 2:2023at00875
Plaintiff:
Craig M. Payton
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
(PS)Wu v. Department of Health and Human Services
as 2:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Charley Wu
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Alford v. USA
as 1:2022cv01056
Plaintiff:
Mark Alford
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Gabriel v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2022at00558
Plaintiff:
Ronell Gabriel
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Gabriel v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 2:2022cv00958
Plaintiff:
Ronell Gabriel
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Griffin v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 2:2022cv00612
Plaintiff:
David Griffin
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Wright et al v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Mary F. Wright and Ronnie Empson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Barham v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2021cv00276
Plaintiff:
Kirk Barham
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
