Connecticut Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 4,335
Dippel v. Members of Congress
as 3:2023cv01619
Plaintiff:
John Van Houten Dippel
Defendant:
Members of Congress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Washington v. City of Bridgeport
as 3:2023cv01607
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Washington
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fields v. City of Bridgeport et al
as 3:2023cv01608
Plaintiff:
Shantell Fields
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport, Carla F. Remle, Joaquim DeBarros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cornish v. Town of Bloomfield et al
as 3:2023cv01587
Plaintiff:
ORane M. Cornish, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of Bloomfield, Jalisa X. Cuevas, Matthew T. Suplee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bank of New York Mellon v. Moore
as 3:2023cv01576
Plaintiff:
Bank of New York Mellon and Bank of New York
Defendant:
Johnny Ray Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Kuhn et al
as 3:2023cv01566
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Williams
Defendant:
Nicholas Kuhn, James Smith, Timothy Speer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shackleford v. US Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 3:2023cv01570
Plaintiff:
Dave D. Shackleford
Defendant:
US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Marcia L. Fudge, City of Stamford and others
Hines v. Hines et al
as 3:2023cv01567
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines
Defendant:
Shameka Hines, Joe Biden, Donald J. Trump and others
Hines v. Leah Arihess Family et al
as 3:2023cv01571
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines
Defendant:
Leah Arihess Family, Nuath Star, Manlia Thihye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Day v. Town of Naugatuck et al
as 3:2023cv01560
Plaintiff:
Jarell Day
Defendant:
Town of Naugatuck, Officer Nicholas D. Kehoss and Nicholas D. Kehoss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
